The Real New World Order News
Archive for the ‘new world order news’ Category
War Globalization and New World Order
Saturday, August 14th, 2010Section 8 is out of Control in Atlanta
Wednesday, August 11th, 2010No Jobs and no housing these are the same people that probaly voted for the Obama Yes we Can Bullshit slogan. Its starting to get worse and worse in America, and this is only the beginning of the fall. Wait till the food supply start to dry up. This will happen next and then the rioting will start and then what the Illumanati wants will happen Martial Law will be declared and then off to the Fema Concentration camps for most of America.
A crowd of over 10,000 people hoping to get federal housing assistance became unruly Wednesday morning with reports of fights breaking out in the crowd.
Thousands of people were lined up at the Tri-Cities Plaza shopping center, hoping to apply for a voucher from the East Point Housing Authority that will give them a discount on their rent.
Obama Yes We Can
People began lining up at the shopping center two days ago, and by Wednesday morning the crowd had grown to over several thousand people. East Point police, some wearing riot helmets, were patrolling the area. Firefighters and EMTs were attending to people who were overheating in the sun. Police from College Park, Hapeville, Fulton County and MARTA assisted in crowd control.
Obama will save me Yes We Can
Felecia McGhee told the AJC she arrived around 6:30 a.m. Wednesday. She said the major problem began when people started breaking into the line and officials started moving the areas where they were handing out applications. She said she saw at least two small children trampled when the crowd rushed the building where the applications were to be handed out.
“It’s a real mess out here,” she said.
East Point Police Sgt. Cliff Chandler said most of those treated were suffering from heat-related illnesses. He did not have a total number of people treated but knew of at least a half-dozen cases. He said a toddler was treated earlier in the morning for “some type of seizure.” He estimated the crowd at 8,000 to 10,000.
Channel 2 Action News reporter Mike Petchenik said fights were breaking out and police had to stop people who were storming the door.
Channel 2 reporter Tom Jones said, “There are thousands, I mean, thousands of people here. I’ve seen people fall out from the heat.”
No injuries were reported but an East Point police officer was treated for heat-related problems.
By late morning the crowd had thinned considerably and people were walking up and getting their applications without delay. But just before the 1 p.m. deadline, a line of about 200 people had formed. Shortly after 1 p.m., several people ran across the parking lot to get in line but were told by police that the line was closed.
Emergency personnel brought in a pickup truck full of bottled water and were handing it out to the crowd.
A sign on the door of the office explained that only applications were being handed out.
“The housing authority will be issuing applications Wednesday, August 11, starting at 9 a.m. Everyone in line by 1 p.m. on the 11th will receive an application. … No Section 8 vouchers are available at this time. There are no public housing units available at this time. You’re applying for the waiting list only.”
The Housing Choice Voucher Program, called Section 8, subsidized the rents of low-income families living in apartments and houses that are privately owned. The federal program makes up the difference in rent that the poor can afford and the fair market value for each area.
For the Record Obamas approval rating is -22 this week the lowest of any President in the History of the United States.
Fidel Castro warns of Nuclear Holocaust
Sunday, August 8th, 2010HAVANA – Ailing Cuban revolutionary leader Fidel Castro has issued a dire warning of a nuclear “holocaust” as he mustered enough strength to address the country’s parliament for the first time since his health crisis four years ago.
The soon-to-be 84 father of the Cuban revolution looked much fitter and more energetic than in previous appearances as he rose to the podium of the National Assembly Saturday to expand on his favorite theme of recent days — alleged US preparations for a nuclear war in the Middle East.
In a series of Internet articles and public comments, Castro has been talking about his fear that the United States and Israel are about to launch a nuclear attack on Iran.
With assembly members listening intently, Castro said it would be up to US President Barack Obama to issue an order to carry out such a strike, but that, if he realized the consequences of this action, “he would not give it”.
“Fate would have it that at this precise moment, the president of the United States would be an offspring of an African man and a white woman, of Muslims and Christians,” Castro said. “He won’t give the order if he becomes aware” of the devastation it would cause.
“We are making a contribution to that persuasive effort,” said the Cuban communist leader.
He stressed that should nuclear war be unleashed, “the existing world order would not survive and would immediately collapse.”
According to Castro, Obama’s advantage was that he was not comparable to former US president Richard Nixon, who was forced to resign in 1974 amid a political scandal.
“Nixon was a cynical man,” commented the Cuban leader. “That country has had a lot of cynical presidents, as well as some ignorant ones.”
Castro, who led Cuba for 48 years, was sidelined in 2006 after a gastrointestinal illness and subsequent operations forced him to leave the presidency now held by his brother Raul Castro, 79.
At one point, Fidel Castro was so frail that he could not stand or walk in public.
His address on Saturday, at times alongside his wife, Dalia Soto del Valle, seemed aimed at underscoring that he was physically back and still in the political fight.
Top leaders including the Cuban president and lawmakers cheered and cried out “Viva Fidel!” as the father of the revolution entered the chamber in an event broadcast live on state television and radio.
But Castro, who turns 84 on August 13, spoke for just over 10 minutes a fleeting appearance for a politician once famous for oratory going on for hours.
Castro was last seen at a ceremony marking a key event in the Cuban revolution on July 26, his seventh public appearance in three weeks.
Though no longer president, Fidel Castro does still hold the powerful position of first secretary of the Communist Party and remains a member of Cuba’s legislature.
Michelle Obama Spends money non stop
Friday, August 6th, 2010She was elected to nothing. She accomplishes nothing. She has 2 dozen taxpayer paid personal assistants. Yet she spends millions of taxpayer’s money as she turns into an international jet setter.
The article below covers her latest junket to Spain. No hotel is too lavish. No meal is too expensive. The whole U.S. economy is at her disposal — and dispose she does. Shortly after her husband was elected to office, Michelle decided she needed a couple hundred new pairs of shoes. So off she went to England. She traveled on a government jet with some of her cronies and security force. In fact, Michelle has been all over the world. Every time she gets the “shopping ” urge, millions more of U.S. dollars leave the wallets and purses of hard working Americans. Even her dog gets his own plane, all at our expense.
None of this should surprise anyone. What should surprise and disgust all of us is the extent of corruption in our government and the lack of ANY outrage on the part of the media whores or general public for that matter. While 40 million Americans are now on food stamps and while millions of Americans are being thrown out of their homes, you can count on anger building. The article below refers to Michelle as a modern day Marie Antoinette. If that comparison is true then the end of that story can’t be far behind. I’m sure millions in the U.S. would love to see how Michelle would look in orange.
Material girl Michelle Obama is a modern-day Marie Antoinette on a glitzy Spanish vacation
Rich Girl, Poor Country
Do you think Michelle Obama should ditch high life for more down-to-Earth image?
Sacrifice is something that many Americans are becoming all too familiar with during this economic downturn. It was a key theme in President Obama’s inaugural address to the nation, and he’s referenced it numerous times when lecturing the country on how to get back on its feet.
But while most of the country is pinching pennies and downsizing summer sojourns – or forgoing them altogether – the Obamas don’t seem to be heeding their own advice. While many of us are struggling, the First Lady is spending the next few days in a five-star hotel on the chic Costa del Sol in southern Spain with 40 of her “closest friends.” According to CNN, the group is expected to occupy 60 to 70 rooms, more than a third of the lodgings at the 160-room resort. Not exactly what one would call cutting back in troubled times.
Reports are calling the lodgings of Obama’s Spanish fiesta, the Hotel Villa Padierna in Marbella, “luxurious,” “posh” and “a millionaires’ playground.” Estimated room rate per night? Up to a staggering $2,500. Method of transportation? Air Force Two.
To be clear, what the Obamas do with their money is one thing; what they do with ours is another. Transporting and housing the estimated 70 Secret Service agents who will flank the material girl will cost the taxpayers a pretty penny.
Perhaps it could be that the Obamas, who seem to fancy themselves more along the lines of international celebrities than actual leaders, espouse a different view of sacrifice. When Michelle Obama accompanied her husband to Copenhagen along with best buddy Oprah Winfrey, she billed the trip – an ultimately unsuccessful bid to bring the Olympics to Chicago – as follows: “As much of a sacrifice as people say this is for me or Oprah or the President to come for these few days, so many of you in this room have been working for years to bring this bid home.”
A quick jaunt to Denmark is a sacrifice? What portraits in courage!
The Obama modus operandi is becoming clear. From lavish trips to Spain to reportedly flying Bo, the President’s Portuguese water dog, on a separate aircraft to vacation with them in Maine, to a date night in New York City that perhaps cost nearly $100,000, their idea of austerity is really just the lap of luxury, at least for ordinary folks.
Incredibly, the Obamas have long portrayed themselves as precisely such commoners. Just this month, Obama told ABC the First Couple is “not that far removed from what most Americans are going through.” And that “it was just a few years ago that we had high credit card balances, we had two kids, thinking about college. We had our own retirement accounts, wondering if we were going to be able to get enough assets in there.”
If that’s true, why not select a more appropriate destination like the California coast? The scenery is just as gorgeous as that of Spain, and instead of patronizing a foreign country they would be pumping money into an American economy that desperately needs it. Camp David wouldn’t exactly be slumming it, either. A long weekend there would really send a message of responsibility, leadership and compassion. For a couple that has sharply criticized former President George W. Bush so widely, they could stand to follow his example for once and select a more low-key locale, as Bush regularly did in his Texas vacations.
Instead, Michelle Obama seems more like a modern-day Marie Antoinette – the French queen who spent extravagantly on clothes and jewels without a thought for her subjects’ plight – than an average mother of two. While she’s spent her time in the White House telling parents they should relieve their chubby kids’ dependency on sugar and stressing the importance of an organic veggie garden, hopping a jet to Europe to meet with Spanish royalty isn’t the visual the White House probably wants to project. Perhaps they’ve forgotten the damning image of John Kerry, on the eve of the 2004 election, windsurfing off the coast of Nantucket?
I don’t begrudge anyone rest and relaxation when they work hard. We all need downtime – the First Family included. It’s the extravagance of Michelle Obama’s trip and glitzy destination contrasted with President Obama’s demonization of the rich that smacks of hypocrisy and perpetuates a disconnect between the country and its leaders. Toning down the flash would humanize the Obamas and signify that they sympathize with the setbacks of the people they were elected to serve.
In January, President Obama insisted that “everybody in the country is going to have to sacrifice something, accept change for the greater good. Everybody is going to have to give. Everybody is going to have to have some skin in the game.”
If sacrifice is the precursor to change, what will the family that ran on change offer up? Elitist doublespeak won’t cut it.
Story Courtesy of newworldordernews
China Develops new Super Missile
Thursday, August 5th, 2010Nothing projects U.S. global air and sea power more vividly than supercarriers. Bristling with fighter jets that can reach deep into even landlocked trouble zones, America’s virtually invincible carrier fleet has long enforced its dominance of the high seas.
China may soon put an end to that.
U.S. naval planners are scrambling to deal with what analysts say is a game-changing weapon being developed by China — an unprecedented carrier-killing missile called the Dong Feng 21D that could be launched from land with enough accuracy to penetrate the defenses of even the most advanced moving aircraft carrier at a distance of more than 1,500 kilometers (900 miles).
Analysts say final testing of the missile could come as soon as the end of this year, though questions remain about how fast China will be able to perfect its accuracy to the level needed to threaten a moving carrier at sea.
The weapon, a version of which was displayed last year in a Chinese military parade, could revolutionize China’s role in the Pacific balance of power, seriously weakening Washington’s ability to intervene in any potential conflict over Taiwan or North Korea. It could also deny U.S. ships safe access to international waters near China’s 11,200-mile (18,000-kilometer) -long coastline.
While a nuclear bomb could theoretically sink a carrier, assuming its user was willing to raise the stakes to atomic levels, the conventionally-armed Dong Feng 21D’s uniqueness is in its ability to hit a powerfully defended moving target with pin-point precision.
Funded by annual double-digit increases in the defense budget for almost every year of the past two decades, the Chinese navy has become Asia’s largest and has expanded beyond its traditional mission of retaking Taiwan to push its sphere of influence deeper into the Pacific and protect vital maritime trade routes.
“The Navy has long had to fear carrier-killing capabilities,” said Patrick Cronin, senior director of the Asia-Pacific Security Program at the nonpartisan, Washington-based Center for a New American Security. “The emerging Chinese antiship missile capability, and in particular the DF 21D, represents the first post-Cold War capability that is both potentially capable of stopping our naval power projection and deliberately designed for that purpose.”
Setting the stage for a possible conflict, Beijing has grown increasingly vocal in its demands for the U.S. to stay away from the wide swaths of ocean — covering much of the Yellow, East and South China seas — where it claims exclusivity.
It strongly opposed plans to hold U.S.-South Korean war games in the Yellow Sea off the northeastern Chinese coast, saying the participation of the USS George Washington supercarrier, with its 1,092-foot (333-meter) flight deck and 6,250 personnel, would be a provocation because it put Beijing within striking range of U.S. F-18 warplanes.
The carrier instead took part in maneuvers held farther away in the Sea of Japan.
U.S. officials deny Chinese pressure kept it away, and say they will not be told by Beijing where they can operate.
“We reserve the right to exercise in international waters anywhere in the world,” Rear Adm. Daniel Cloyd, who headed the U.S. side of the exercises, said aboard the carrier during the maneuvers, which ended last week.
But the new missile, if able to evade the defenses of a carrier and of the vessels sailing with it, could undermine that policy.
“China can reach out and hit the U.S. well before the U.S. can get close enough to the mainland to hit back,” said Toshi Yoshihara, an associate professor at the U.S. Naval War College. He said U.S. ships have only twice been that vulnerable — against Japan in World War II and against Soviet bombers in the Cold War.
Carrier-killing missiles “could have an enduring psychological effect on U.S. policymakers,” . “It underscores more broadly that the U.S. Navy no longer rules the waves as it has since the end of World War II. The stark reality is that sea control cannot be taken for granted anymore.”
Yoshihara said the weapon is causing considerable consternation in Washington, though — with attention focused on land wars in Afghanistan and Iraq — its implications haven’t been widely discussed in public.
Analysts note that while much has been made of China’s efforts to ready a carrier fleet of its own, it would likely take decades to catch U.S. carrier crews’ level of expertise, training and experience.
But Beijing does not need to match the U.S. carrier for carrier. The Dong Feng 21D, smarter, and vastly cheaper, could successfully attack a U.S. carrier, or at least deter it from getting too close.
U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates warned of the threat in a speech last September at the Air Force Association Convention.
“When considering the military-modernization programs of countries like China, we should be concerned less with their potential ability to challenge the U.S. symmetrically — fighter to fighter or ship to ship — and more with their ability to disrupt our freedom of movement and narrow our strategic options,” he said.
Gates said China’s investments in cyber and anti-satellite warfare, anti-air and anti-ship weaponry, along with ballistic missiles, “could threaten America’s primary way to project power” through its forward air bases and carrier strike groups.
The Pentagon has been worried for years about China getting an anti-ship ballistic missile. The Pentagon considers such a missile an “anti-access,” weapon, meaning that it could deny others access to certain areas.
The Air Force’s top surveillance and intelligence officer, Lt. Gen. David Deptula, told reporters this week that China’s effort to increase anti-access capability is part of a worrisome trend.
He did not single out the DF 21D, but said: “While we might not fight the Chinese, we may end up in situations where we’ll certainly be opposing the equipment that they build and sell around the world.”
Questions remain over when — and if — China will perfect the technology; hitting a moving carrier is no mean feat, requiring state-of-the-art guidance systems, and some experts believe it will take China a decade or so to field a reliable threat. Others, however, say final tests of the missile could come in the next year or two.
Former Navy commander James Kraska, a professor of international law and sea power at the U.S. Naval War College, recently wrote a controversial article in the magazine Orbis outlining a hypothetical scenario set just five years from now in which a Deng Feng 21D missile with a penetrator warhead sinks the USS George Washington.
That would usher in a “new epoch of international order in which Beijing emerges to displace the United States.”
While China’s Defense Ministry never comments on new weapons before they become operational, the DF 21D — which would travel at 10 times the speed of sound and carry conventional payloads — has been much discussed by military buffs online.
A pseudonymous article posted on Xinhuanet, website of China’s official news agency, imagines the U.S. dispatching the George Washington to aid Taiwan against a Chinese attack.
The Chinese would respond with three salvos of DF 21D, the first of which would pierce the hull, start fires and shut down flight operations, the article says. The second would knock out its engines and be accompanied by air attacks. The third wave, the article says, would “send the George Washington to the bottom of the ocean.”
Terrorstorm
Thursday, August 5th, 2010An Alex Jones film that covers in detail the proven history of government sponsored terrorism, and focuses on the 7/7 London bombings and 9/11.
New World Order Monetary System
Wednesday, August 4th, 2010This video is about 2 years old but very relevant today, as nothing has changed it has only gotten worse. Watch it and educate yourself .
The Coming Depression in America the Facts
Sunday, August 1st, 2010Most of you will not understand this post, it is not because you are not intelligent it is because you are what I like to call a sheeple. You believe everything you see on Television, you believe that Barack Obama runs America , You believe what the media tells you. You think you are blessed because you live in the good old U.S.A and you will never have to suffer like the rest of the world. Well guess again fools, the end is oh so near for life the way we enjoy it in america.
The manifesto of the Illuminati
Do you know the ‘golden rule’? It is, ‘He that has the gold, makes the rules.’ Once all of the gold is secured, all the rules can be set to ensure absolute power. To make it happen, a group effort would be needed to collect all the money. How would the group go about accumulating all the money and ultimately, all the gold? Where would they get the power to implement such a plan? If we are investing for our share of the money, we better get to know the competition. For purposes of simplicity, let’s just call the group that is trying to monopolize the money, the ‘illuminati’.
Let me start by defining ‘illuminati’. The word is Latin and it basically means ‘the enlightened ones’. Members of an illuminati believe themselves to be especially enlightened on certain subjects and are therefore superior in intellect to their peers. The term has been applied to ‘shadow governments’ and bankers who seek absolute control over wealth. Absolute power can be acquired by force or coercion. Force can breed resistance. Coercion can breed compliance. Mao Tse-Tung once said that ‘political power grows out of the barrel of a gun’. Joseph Goebbels once said, ‘If you tell a big enough lie, and keep repeating it, people begin believing it. The truth, therefore, becomes the enemy of the state.’ So we have different strategies to obtain complete economic and political control. The illuminati is aggressively seeking that control today. The purpose of this article is not to argue the existence, but rather the means. Without doubt, governments and banks now dominate markets, economics, and politics more so than ever before. The question is, therefore, how do they maintain control and how should investors adjust?
So how does the illuminati exert their power? Vastly outnumbered, they would raise the ire of the population if they imposed their will with military force or any such overt efforts. Mao could be defeated in a military conflict. Jefferson could be defeated by a virulent plague of citizenry ignorance. But Goebbels might have been on to something. In truth, the illuminati’s chief weapon is the ignorance of the population perpetuated by the false promise of security. The illuminati herd the populace in the desired direction with lies and material illusion. They divert attention from their ambitions by promising an improving stock market, arranging for easy loans for nice houses and shiny cars, and by manipulating the public psyche through trained speakers espousing the doctrine of government solution by ‘spreading the wealth around’. They constantly monitor their subjects so as to maintain power. Their eyes, or ‘I’s', are always upon us. The following is their manifesto.
Invent
The first step to acquiring real power is to invent the medium of financial exchange. Precious metals actually work fine but they are finite and the supply cannot be controlled and monopolized. Money is the invention. Coins made of precious metals are fine but go back and read the previous sentence. Aaahh – paper money is best because it can be manufactured to infinity, it is cheap to print, and it shifts real power to the printer. Why? Because now, the ‘value’ of everything has a ‘price’ that is set from the paper printer. The paper money has to be confined to a single holder – the banks – to ensure it maintains an assigned and implied value. Then the banks can use ‘fractional banking’ that allows them to loan exponentially more money than they have on deposit. Finally the banks can use a new and wondrous invention – derivatives. The loans that they write become ‘securitized’ so they can be sold to other bankers and pseudo bankers who then derive an income stream from the interest coupons attached to the loans. Principal, and return thereof, is no longer important. The money has an implied worthlessness. As long as interest obligations are met, the derivatives resupply lent principal while they serve to petrify the debt and therefore become substitutes for currency. The magic of ‘derivatives’ is invented so that the banks can now issue paper whose value is tied to the value of another piece of paper. ‘Capital’ is simply created. It is ‘invented’. And the best part of all is the derivative capital is cost-free and infinite in supply. The banks just have to convince the idiots of the world to accept their ‘capital’ as currency. Check.
Infiltrate
To coerce people to give up all of their money, the illuminati would have to infiltrate both society and the psyche of society. The psyche is the easy part. If a person has $100 dollars and the bank loans them another $100 dollars, the person ‘feels’ richer. Perhaps they can now buy a new TV or some other form of intellectual destruction like rap music. Everyone wants to ‘feel’ richer, right? Sure, the bank has the person fill out some official looking paperwork that engenders even more importance. In the end, the loan is made and the person thinks he is richer. The infiltration of society is a little tougher. The quickest way would be to use military force. But, as already discussed, this strategy would have some major negatives. No, the trick here is to disguise the true intent. To pull this off, society has to believe that lenders are benevolent. They also have to believe that their government is not only benevolent, but also competent. (Hey, quit laughing. I never said society was very smart!) For instance, as a reaction to the greatest financial debacle since the Great Depression, a push for financial ‘reform’ in the US was undertaken. The committee assigned to write the new legislation was spearheaded by Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. These men have been in charge of overseeing financial regulations for years. The failure of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac along with the explosion of derivative trading and the real estate bubble rests squarely at their feet. Allowing them to author more financial regulation is like hiring the Skipper and Gilligan for a three hour tour! Let me amplify this with the FASB accounting rule known as Statement 159. I have included this in past lectures that I have done but basically the rule allows banks to play ‘heads I win, tails you lose’. When bonds issued by banks fall in value, the bank books the loss as profit. Incredibly, the loss becomes income. In the first quarter of 2010, the four largest US banks reported a combined $13 billion in income by using Statement 159. That alone accounts for 20% of their supposed ‘profits’. When did it become apparent to all of society that banks were broke? 2007. When did Statement 159 become rule? 2007. Check.
Illiterate
It takes time. If a group wants absolute control, it must dumb down the population. Education must be stifled. History must be re-written and sanitized. The US now has a 69% on-time high school graduation rate. Only a quarter or so of the population has a college degree. Television is dumbed down to a bunch of reality shows portraying the lives of idiots that are supposed to amuse us. And, that’s only C-SPAN. The media has become so fecklessly inept, that the best financial/ economic writer around right now is Matt Taibbi of the music magazine, Rolling Stone. Political leaders are clueless as they continue to show an unfathomable lack of understanding about debt and its destructive powers. The new currency of banks is derivatives and how many people want to hear about those things? Political leaders run all over the world spewing misstatements and false information. The Federal Reserve constantly issues mendacious statements calculated to further their conquest. Three times in 2006 and 2007, Mr. Bernanke stated that an inverted yield curve was not a precursor to recession and in fact, the economy was strong. Yet, no one challenged those assertions even though statistics and charts clearly say the opposite. Need I say more? Ignorance surrenders power. Check.
Intoxicate
Helmand Province in Afghanistan is where 90% of the world’s heroin comes from. That’s why the latest military ‘surge’ was focused in that region. Control the drugs and one controls the intoxicants. Acquiring real power is about eliminating competition. Let’s use a time line here. Since the Federal Reserve came to power in 1913, we have endured WW I, WW II, the Korean War, Viet Nam, and the Gulf war. Now our military forces are dispatched to Iraq and Afghanistan. When the military lease on Okinawa was terminating, a South Korean submarine was supposedly sank by a North Korean torpedo. The lease was immediately renewed and a bank loan was no doubt extended. Why is this sequence important? Wars produce debt and banks provide the supply. Wars also produce horrific casualties and Vietnam was probably all society could take. Since then, casualties have been greatly reduced. There is nothing like a steady stream of body bags to raise suspicion that something else is driving the process. When did the era of drugs explode? Yep, right when Vietnam became a quagmire. If societal control cannot be exercised through war, drugs can be used. Society has to be either eliminated or stoned and drunk. Otherwise, they might rise from their coma and rebel against absolute control. The illuminate does not want society to get wise to their impending despotic ruin. At the very least, the intoxicated part of society gets eliminated from threat of power competition. Check.
Incarcerate
Society is better controlled behind bars. Intoxification has to be criminalized. Drugs are illegal. If a large segment of society is imprisoned, there is less of a threat to the power. This may be depressing, but we must understand the facts. For the first time in the history, in 1995 the US started spending more on building prisons than on building colleges. In 1999, The US spent $41 billion on incarceration and $16 billion on welfare. In 2008, there were 2.3 million inmates in US prisons. 3.2% of the population is either in jail, on probation, or on parole. In 2008, states spent $50 billion on the prison system and the federal government spent $5 billion. As of 2006, states were spending 7% of their budgets on prisons. In spite of what government liars (yes, that’s an oxymoron) say about inflation, health care costs for inmates is growing by 10% per year. Why has incarceration become a bigger portion of the plan? Violent crime in the US has been relatively stable since 1980. But since drug laws changed, drug convictions have risen 12 fold. The US leads the world in percent of the population incarcerated. China is second. Those incarcerated have taken the place of the body bags. Soon, we will have new laws like the health care tax that will allow for even more non-compliant citizens to be put away. Tommy Chong was jailed for water pipe (drug paraphernalia) sales across the state line of Pennsylvania (I believe). When asked what it was like to go to jail, he replied, “You’ll find out.†War is ugly. Check.
Institutionalize
Government control is institutionalization. When the government imposes absolute power over society, no one questions the government’s mandates for fear of penalty. Freedom’s have to be curtailed. Events can be orchestrated to affect surrender. The Patriot Act is an example of the surrender of liberties. Catastrophic events can lead to more reliance on the all-powerful government. These events work in favor of the illuminati to exercise more control. The goal is to get everyone thinking alike. That makes herd control much easier. Control education. Control the media. Control behavior. Control thought. Check.
Impoverish
Poor education and bouts of incarceration lead to impoverishment. Give them a big TV and sporty car to drive, and the impoverished won’t rebel against the power. Real pay in the US is declining and the price of education is escalating. 40 million Americans rely on the government for food assistance via food stamps. The ‘food stamps’ are actually debit cards issued by JP Morgan bank. Human suffering profits the banks. Current unemployment is double digits and home foreclosures are still setting records. It is estimated that one million homes will be foreclosed in the US in 2010. There are another 5 million that are considered ‘seriously delinquent. Poor people fight for crumbs. Check.
Immigrate
Unfettered immigration dilutes the culture and creates a need for government assistance. Government assistance is administered at a great cost. Liberty. Check.
Indebt
Those who avoid any of the above, will surely fall victim to indebtedness. From the institutionalized lie that we could all live better if we just had access to more credit, our society has become more indebted than ever before. Citizens and sovereign nations alike have spent more than they can ever repay. Who supplied the credit? The banks. Where did they get the money? They invented it. How did they talk us into accepting the debt? They made it sound like there was no risk. Why was there no risk? Because derivatives were invented to diminish credit risks. Infinite debt can no longer ‘break the bank’. As long as the interest coupon on the debt can be paid each month, the derivative world can keep the debt afloat. Hopeless indebtedness results in a transfer of assets from the indebted to the lender. The lender maintains full power over the indebted. The US is now more than $13.2 trillion in debt. Check.
Enslave
Once society is completely and hopelessly indebted, it is therefore enslaved. Once society gets to this point, no one will know, or care, whether ‘enslave’ starts with an ‘I’ or an ‘E’. When the nefarious emperor cracks the whip, society complies. Slaves have nowhere to run and no weapons with which to fight. Their intellect has been stolen and their leaders have defected. When the US economy faced a financial ‘catastrophe’ (only the banks were broke – not corporate America), Congress surrendered the Treasury (the gold) to the banks. No bullets were needed. Pelosi and her minions embraced the lie. Mao lost. Goebbels won. Check.
Welcome to the new order of the ‘illuminati’. The enlightened ones now exert more and more power in their efforts to control the world. Money is power and infinite money is infinite power. It is only possible through derivatives. One can debate the existence of a physical illuminati body. One cannot debate the footprints of such intent. We are gradually moving towards one government and one bank. There is a strategy in place. Sadly, I don’t believe there is enough Jeffersonian intellect nor enough Jacksonian courage to repel the forces intent on driving us into the abyss.
Now what do we do to invest our money? We know that total power resides in the hands of central bankers. That power will not be challenged because a large part of the population is too ignorant to understand who is holding their leash and rest of the population is enslaved by their debt enabling investments. Those investments are totally controlled by the central banks in what used to be called a ‘stock market’. Let’s just be honest and call it what it is – a ‘casino’. With no Fed to goose indexes higher, where might they go? What supposed investing ‘skills’ do most people really have? To understand what to expect in the future, let’s look at the past few months.
The Dow rolled over in late April and experienced a 10-minute ‘flash crash’ of 1,000 points on May 6, 2010. I say the ECB liquidated stocks to prepare a Euro-bank bailout but truth is the enemy of the state. Anyway, as always, the central banks responded with the ECB announcing a trillion dollar bailout of the Euro-banks. The Dow immediately rallied back up some 800 points. Bear in mind, this was in response to the paltry $30 billion that Greece could not repay. Given the reality of a bankrupt world, the Dow made a lower high, then gave up the gains and made a new low in the now evident down-trend (lower highs, lower lows). To arrest this decline (and pretend that all was well), the Plunge Protection Team (PPT) orchestrated a 125-point rally in the final 30 minutes of trading on May 21. Two days later, the Dow made a new low and was off 250 points before the PPT brought it back at the end of the day once again. The Treasury auction another $110 billion in debt (as if it matters anymore). June opened with the Dow losing another 400 points (a lower low) until the ECB said they would in fact start buying Euro-bank debt for the first time ever. The Treasury auctioned another $70 billion in debt and the Dow rallied 500 points over the course of a few weeks. But, reality is a bear and the Dow rolled back over (after making a lower high) going down into July. The Dow made yet a new lower low on July 2. After the July 4 holiday, the Dow opened on July 5 and went down 150 points only to recover it all plus some including 60 points in the last ten minutes. Presto! Another rally was on! To emphasize the rally, on July 8, the PPT tacked on 80 points to the Dow in the final hour of trading. 25% of the total intraday volume came in that final hour. Obviously a rally ensued and so on. When it looked doomed for failure, the PPT jolted the Dow up some 100 points in the final hour of trading on July 15. Will it hold? The last lower high for the Dow was about 10,500. The PPT needs a close above that mark to end the down-trend. We shall see. In the modern stock casino, every turn in trend is a ‘V’ and not a ‘U’. The abruptness of intervention and manipulation is what we must now embrace.
The point is this. The casino is now controlled by the central bankers who only act when the casino lights begin to flicker. They jolt the indices with buy programs and instigate rallies. Why? The casino is the ultimate illusion. As long as the casino keeps the light on, the part of society that is not yet institutionalized thinks they have a chance to make the slot machine pay off. Occasionally, the perpetrators allow three oranges to appear. They have to. Otherwise, we would all go away and they couldn’t even afford to keep the casino operating. We either believe the illusion or not. If so, we keep playing. If not, the PPT ‘creates’ a winner replete with buzzers and whistles and pontificators and prevaricators blaring the virtues of investing right down our greedy little ear canals. If we plan to keep any of our gold, we must understand the rules of the war. Investing has changed so that we must now be in sync with the manipulators that have all the power. We must be in and out with skilful deftness. Or, we can choose to remain seated while the manipulators draw three oranges on the board. Forget fundamentals. They are meaningless. Besides, they are all made up and manipulated. Every casino rally now comes from a central bank action. Every action comes at a casino dip. If you think you are investing for the long run, remember this. Once the illuminati captures all the gold, they will no longer need to keep the casino open. Checkmate. Enslavement is a lie. Truth cannot be enslaved.
Barack Obama and the End of America
Wednesday, July 28th, 2010
Jesse Ventura Talks with Alex Jones About Government Harassment of His TV Show 1/2
Saturday, July 24th, 2010
