According to the official FA Cup draw which was done recently, Crewe Alexandra have found out that they will be going head to head against League One outfit Barnsley and will be traveling to their opponents in the second round of the FA Cup this season. The club that advances from this tie is set to pocket a sum it £67,000 in prize money and the two clubs will be hoping that they would end up on the victorious side if the clash. The two clubs have locked horns four times in the past, with the first tie ending in a 1-1 draw in the 1905-06 season. There was a replay of the match in that same season and Crewe lost the tie 4-0 at Oakwell,

Fast track to the 26/27 season, Crewe would also lose a match between the two clubs by a huge scoreline if 6-1 at the same venue. The last time the Teo clubs met was three seasons ago, with the Tykes coming out victorious after recording a 3-1 win at the Alexandra Stadium. The weekend if the 26th of November is when their next tie will take place and they will both have a replay on 6th/7th of December.

Here’s the draw in full:

Accrington Stanley vs Barnet/Chelmsford

Barnsley vs Crewe Alexandra

Bracknell Town/Ipswich Town vs Buxton

Bristol Rovers vs Boreham Wood

Burton Albion vs Chippenham Town

Charlton Athletic vs Stockport County

Curzon Ashton/Cambridge United vs Grimsby Town

Dagenham &Redbridge vs AFC Fylde/Gillingham

Ebbsfleet United vs Fleetwood Town

Forest Green Rovers vs Alvechurch

King’s Lynn Town vs Stevenage

Newport County vs Torquay United/Derby CountyPortsmouth vs MK Dons

Sheffield Wednesday vs Mansfield Town

Shrewsbury Town vs Peterborough United/Salford City

SolihullMorrs/Hartlepool United vs Harrogate Town

Walsall vs Carlisle United

Weymouth/AFC Wimbledon vs Chesterfield

Woking/Oxford United vs Exeter City

Wrexham vs Farnborough


French winger Allan Saint-Maximin (ASM) is a big doubt for Newcastle United ahead of their Premier League trip to face London team Brentford at the Brentford Community Stadium. The Frenchman was confirmed as doubtful for the game by his manager due to injury. In his pre-match chat with media practitioners on Friday, Newcastle United manager Eddie Howe said that Saint-Maximin has been getting intensive treatment away from the team and that a late call would be made on his availability for the Brentford game.

Saint-Maximin missed the 1-1 draw at West Ham United in the league last weekend after he picked up a calf injury during the penultimate league game against visitors Aston Villa. He has been one of the best players at Newcastle United this season as they set sights on pulling away from the relegation zone between now and the remainder of this season starting with the Brentford game.

In the earlier league fixture between hosts Newcastle United and Brentford, there was no winner after the game ended in a thrilling 3-3 draw. It was the first game under the Eddie Howe managerial era at Newcastle United, but he missed it due to Covid-19 with assistant manager Jason Tindall taking his place in the dugout.

Newcastle United have picked up ten points from their last four league games and that has enabled to move out of the relegation zone as far as the Premier League log is concerned. They are currently two points clear of Burnley who are third from bottom on the log.

For Brentford, they have been boosted with the news that new signing Christian Eriksen will make his debut against the Magpies. The Dane is expected to play his first competitive game since he suffered a heart attack while playing for his country at the Euro 2020 tournament.

Dispute Resolution Methods: Litigation, Mediation, and Negotiation Explained

Regardless if they take place in commercial dealings, interpersonal relationships, or other contexts, disputes are an unavoidable aspect of life. Maintaining connections and getting the results you want requires efficient and effective conflict resolution. We shall examine three often utilised conflict resolution techniques in this article: litigation, mediation, and negotiation. Individuals and corporations may make wise judgements when faced with a disagreement by being aware of the features, advantages, and restrictions of each option.

Litigation: Adjudication through the Court System

The traditional and formal process for settling conflicts through the legal system is litigation. It involves bringing the matter to a judge or jury, who will decide the case in accordance with the facts and defences put up by each side. The process of litigation is often formal and hostile, with each side arguing their case.

A regulated legal framework with set guidelines is provided through litigation. It gives both parties the chance to express their arguments and have a fair judge consider them. However, litigation may be costly, time-consuming, and demanding emotionally. It might also lead to a lose-lose situation where neither party is completely satisfied with the court’s ruling. Despite these disadvantages, litigation may be necessary in complicated legal situations when a binding ruling or a legal precedent is desired.

Mediation: Facilitated Negotiation with a Neutral Third Party

The mediator serves as a neutral third party in the voluntary and non-adversarial mediation process. The goal of mediation, as opposed to litigation, is to help the conflicting parties communicate, understand one another, and come to an acceptable agreement. The mediator supports the bargaining process but does not provide a final verdict.

Greater result control, cost-effectiveness, and secrecy are the few advantages that mediation offers. It enables the parties to investigate creative responses catered to their unique requirements and interests. When privacy or continuing connections are crucial factors in a disagreement, mediation can be very successful in reaching a resolution. It facilitates candid communication, enables parties to comprehend one another’s viewpoints, and leads to win-win solutions. Although participation in the process and collaboration are required, mediation is more likely to preserve relationships and promote win-win outcomes.

Negotiation: Direct Communication and Agreement

A key approach to settling conflicts is through negotiation, which involves open dialogue and consent between the parties. It may take place without any help from legal advice. The purpose of negotiation is to come to a mutually acceptable solution without the involvement of a third party. Parties are allowed to express their viewpoints, interests, and concerns throughout this process.

The parties have the most control over the result during negotiations because of the flexibility and informality of the process. It frequently results in cost-effective outcomes and speedy answers. However, it calls for strong communication, flexibility, and a willingness to compromise. When a neutral third party’s facilitation is required for very complicated or emotionally charged disagreements, it might not be practical.

Choosing the Appropriate Dispute Resolution Method

Criterias such as the nature of the conflict, the desired outcome, the degree of complexity, and the parties’ willingness to collaborate, must be taken into consideration when choosing the best dispute resolution process. It is crucial to take each method’s expenses, time restrictions, and long-term effects into account.

To safeguard legal rights or create legal precedents, litigation could be required in some circumstances. However, there are also options that put cooperation and maintaining relationships first, such as mediation and negotiation. When business connections or potential economic dealings are involved, mediation and negotiating can be extremely helpful.

A legal professional, such as the solicitors at Darwin Gray, will be able to help you choose the best course of action for your case. It is important to seek legal advice in such cases for a smooth and efficient process. 


Life will inevitably involve disagreements, but how we choose to handle them may have an important impact on the results and relationships involved. Each of the three methods of conflict resolution—litigation, mediation, and negotiation—offers a unique strategy with varied levels of formality, control, and third parties involvement.

Although litigation offers a well-defined legal process and a court’s ruling is final, it may be expensive, time-consuming, and even strained relationships. On the contrary, mediation involves a third party who serves as a neutral facilitator of discussion who helps in reaching at a mutually agreeable solution. It fosters comprehension, upholds bonds, and grants more influence over the result. Negotiation offers flexibility and informality by allowing parties to speak openly to one another and get to a mutually acceptable conclusion.

It is essential to take the details of the conflict and the desired result into account when choosing a dispute resolution approach. It is important to consider variables including complexity, expense, time restrictions, and the nature of the connection between the parties. To determine which approach is best for a certain circumstance, it could be helpful to speak with legal experts who focus on conflict resolution.

The bottom line is, being aware of the features and advantages of litigation, mediation, and negotiation enables people and organizations to behave sensibly in the event of a conflict. Each technique has its own benefits and drawbacks, and the best course of action will be determined by the details of the disagreement and the parties involved. Parties can select a conflict resolution process that supports their goals, encourages good communication, and eventually results in a satisfactory settlement while maintaining crucial relationships by carefully taking into account these criteria.